Chapter 30 – Passage of Discovery: An Ecologist’s Guide to the Missouri River of Lewis and Clark

by Daniel B. Botkin, originally published by Perigee Books, a division of Penguin/Putnam, 1999.

This book, originally published as “Passage of Discovery, is an ecologist’s guide to the first half of the Lewis and Clark trail, their travels up the Missouri River from St. Louis to Three Forks, MT.  I have decided to share this book with the readers of my website, and I am going to present the entire book here, one chapter at a time, with a new chapter appearing each week.  There are more than 40 chapters.  If you follow along and read all of them, you will learn about the entire Missouri River as seen by Lewis and Clark at the beginning of the 19th century, and as I visited it during the 1990s to see what they had seen, and to learn how the countryside had changed.  Comparing what Lewis and Clark saw with what we see today is one of the best insights we can get of how nature and environment in American has changed since European settlement.   I hope you enjoy it and find it rewarding.

- Daniel B. Botkin

All of the chapters published thus far can be found in the Passage of Discovery category. Please note that they are listed in reverse order of date posted.

More books by Daniel Botkin are available for purchase from the Center For the Study Of the Environment bookstore.

30. Fort Mandan, North Dakota: Winter on the Plains

From Bismarck take Route 83 north to Washburn.  Do not take the turnoff into the town of Washburn.  Go just north of Washburn and take a left turn on Route 200.  Watch for a sign on the right that says two miles to the Fort Mandan reconstruction open 1-5 Tuesday through Sunday.  Make an immediate right turn.  This road takes you to the edge of the river, and you will be on the east side of the Missouri River.  The Lewis and Clark Interpretive Center, dedicated in June 1997, is located here.

An interesting circle route from Bismarck is to go first to the reconstruction of Fort Mandan, then take Route 83 north to connect to Route 1806, a route named in honor of Lewis and Clark’s year of return, to Garrison Dam which forms Lake Sacagawea.  Then  drive to Sacagawea State Park where there is good viewing of wildlife.  From there return on Route 1806 east to Route 200 south and visit the Knife River Indian Village National Historical Site.  This is an archeological site and a reconstruction of the villages of the Indians that Lewis and Clark would have seen.  From there take Route 200 south and east. If there is time, take a side trip on Route 200A to Hensier on a gravel road south a few miles to Sanger and then a gravel road east a few miles to Cross Ranch State Park on the shore of the Missouri River, a park purchased by the Nature Conservancy.  From there return west on the gravel road and continue south on the first gravel road to Route 25 southeast to Interstate 94 and then to Bismarck.

Lewis and Clark reached the Mandan village where the expedition would spend its first  winter on October 21, 1804.  Auspiciously, the day after they arrived, they saw a beautiful plain “covered with herds of buffalo,”  one of which they shot for food. Although winter was approaching, their arrival was pretty much as planned. They were still in “discovered” country, land that had become known to Europeans, mainly French-Canadian traders, trappers, and hunters, the usual raggle-taggle of the curious, the rough, the ill-fit, and the outcasts of civilization.  From these, the Mandan villages were known to Lewis and Clark as a place of peaceful Indians where they might overwinter.  The maps that they saw in St. Louis in 1803 and early 1804, and had copied and carried with them, showed the Missouri up to these villages.

Methodical as always, they had reached this destination just in time before winter set in, and knew that it would be impractical to proceed farther that year.  Winter had approached the expedition with a deliberateness recorded firmly in the pages of their journals.  Observant of everything and determined in their attempts to record what they saw, Lewis and Clark wrote of the change in the seasons as they approached the area that is now near Bismarck, North Dakota.  On the first of October the leaves of ash and popular and most of the shrubs had begun to turn yellow and “decline.”  There was a slight “white” frost on the fifth of October, and they saw brant and geese “passing to south”; frost the next night and teal, gulls, and mallards.  On the 13th the cottonwoods were yellow and their leaves falling; on the 14th the leaves of all the ash, elm and all other trees except cottonwood had fallen; on the 17th snow geese passed overhead.  Pronghorn antelope passed on their fall migration.

Lewis and Clark brought a thermometer along with them and recorded the temperature at noon and at four in the afternoon whenever possible.  During their winter with the Mandans, they recorded temperatures in January 1805 that ranged within a few weeks time from minus forty to plus thirty-five degrees Fahrenheit.  The next summer, Clark and Sacagawea were almost drowned by an intense thunder and hailstorm; within a month afterward, Clark walked in dry heat that gave him sunstroke.  Extremes of weather seemed to be the rule.  Part of the reason for these extremes is that the Missouri River Basin lies totally within the interior of a major continent far from the ameliorating effects of an ocean.

Interiors of continents are notorious for their highly variable climate.  Fast changes in temperature, like those Lewis and Clark experienced in January 1805, occur because the Missouri River Basin is at the crossroads of major air masses.  Some come from the north, some from the south, generally one alternating with the other.  This leads to large changes in temperature over a few days, even within a few hours.  In the basin as a whole, temperature extremes range from -20 degrees Fahrenheit in the winter to 110 degrees in the summer, although Lewis and Clark measured even deeper cold.

On the 19th of October, 1804, there was a hard frost, freezing clay near the river as well as water in containers.  The day after they arrived at the Mandan villages, a half inch of snow fell.  By the 25th all the leaves on the trees had fallen, including those of the cottonwoods.  Snow fell but did not stay on the ground.  Violent winds struck on the 28th and 29th, and in this way winter came.

They would stay here until April 7, 1805, – more than five months. They began to build their winter camp on the second of November, calling it Fort Mandan, at a site later known as Fort Clark, since believed to have been washed away by the Missouri.  In the early summer of 1998, the federal government provided a grant for further work on Fort Mandan.  Additional searching is now being conducted for Fort Mandan and a preliminary site survey has been made.  I came to see a reconstruction of Fort Mandan at a small park located about eight miles down river from the original site.  Since Bismarck, North Dakota and International Falls, Minnesota seem to vie for the coldest winter temperatures, I wanted to see the place where Lewis and Clark survived a cold winter with little equipment, and to find out as much as I could about how they did it.

I had spent most of one winter with my wife and newly born daughter in a small, old farmhouse heated only by one wood stove and two fireplaces.  The house I stayed in was in Acworth, New Hampshire, far from North Dakota in miles, but with severe winters, perhaps not quite as cold as Bismarck, North Dakota, but chilly enough.  The house sat on a slope, so that the winter winds whistled up through thin and worn siding into a partial basement and then into the living room.  I heated the house with firewood that I cut and split myself.  My daughter was born in the fall and knew her first five months in that house.  The memories of the cold and the time spent cutting wood and keeping the fires going in the middle of the night came back to me as we drove out of Bismarck to find the reconstruction of the Lewis and Clark campsite.

We took Route 83 north, through farm country —  hay, corn, grain, a few cows, then turned left onto Route 200.  A sign on the right said two miles to the Fort Mandan reconstruction.  We made an immediate right turn and drove to the river.  A flock of magpies scattered in the grass by the road.

A sign at the visitor’s center showed a map of the area, indicating that the Fort Mandan reconstruction was several miles down the river from the original Fort Mandan.  The original fort was upstream on this side of the Missouri, and almost directly across the river from the present Fort Clark State Historical site, a site off of Route 200 on the west shore. We could see that our circle route would take us to that historical site.

It was noon and there were no other visitors.  I hadn’t understood from the  Lewis and Clark journals that they had camped down on the floodplain where a modest bluff provided some protection from the winds, and within a grove of cottonwoods along the river that provided additional protection from the winds.  The reconstruction had these features, and perhaps the original Fort Mandan was located near the shore for the same reasons, and also because that was where cottonwoods, the only large trees in any abundance in this part of the plains, grew.  How much worse the winter would have been in crude huts up above the floodplain, without the protection of the bluffs along the river or the trees.

Lewis and Clark had the men build huts of cottonwood, “this being the only timber we have,” Clark wrote on November 6, 1804.  Sargent Gass described the huts as “in two rows, containing four rooms each, and joined at one end forming an angle.”  The floor was of split planks, covered with clay and grass.  The roofs reached about 18 feet above the ground.  Two store rooms were built in the angle formed by the other huts.  During the building of the fort, two men cut themselves with axes.  Meanwhile, ducks, geese, and brants continued to pass overhead.  On November 13th, the men moved into their huts and began their stay for the winter.  The next day Clark wrote that the ice was “running very thick” as the river rose and some snow fell.  On the 16th “a very white frost” covered “all the trees” with ice, and all the men moved into huts, finished or not.

Along with, and as a consequence of, the varying temperatures, the Missouri River Basin has a great variation in wind, reaching 100 miles per hour.  Winds are strongest in the spring as a rule.  The high winds increase the rate of water evaporation, make the soil drier than would occur from the temperature and rainfall in comparatively still air.  Winter blizzards – snow storms with strong winds – are a common winter hazard.

With the huts finished enough to protect them from the worst of the weather, the men of the expedition then turned to hunting — out of necessity.  On the 19th of November the hunters returned with “32 deer, 12 elk and a buffalo,” the first mention in the journals of buffalo since mid-October, most likely because Lewis and Clark had been occupied with preparation for the winter, rather than the lack of the animals in the neighborhood.  The weather improved toward the end of November.  November 23rd was a “far warm day” as were the next two, but then the weather turned again and became very cold and windy.

On the 30th of November the Mandan chief told Lewis and Clark that some of his hunters had been attacked and killed by the Sioux.  “We thought it well to show a disposition to aid and assist them against their enemies,” Clark wrote.  Lewis and Clark took 23 men armed and on horseback with a promise to defend the Mandans, but the chief suggested that they wait until spring because the snow was too deep for the horses and it was too cold.   Winter was closing in upon them and their crude huts were barely completed, a food supply was not in, but they took up arms and went out with their horses to help their hosts against enemies.  So began their first winter on the plains.

On December 7, 1804 the Chief of the Mandans told Lewis and Clark that there were “great numbers of buffalo” on the hills nearby.  Lewis went with a hunting party of 15 of his men and killed 11, “three in view of our fort,” but the weather was “so excessively cold and the wolves plenty, we only saved five of them.”  Clark went with another party on the next day with 18 men and four horses, when the temperature was 44 degrees below freezing, and found buffalo about seven miles away.  They killed eight, but several of the men suffered frostbite.  On the ninth, Lewis went out and stayed out all night, experiencing “a cold disagreeable night . . . in the snow on a cold point with one small blanket.”  The ice was so hard on the river that the buffalo crossed without breaking through.  Lewis and his men killed nine buffalo, but many were “so meager that they [were] not fit for use.”   On the 12th, pronghorn were seen but the weather was “so cold that we do not think it prudent to turn out to hunt.”  Clark, however, with his proclivity to make measurements, paced the width of the river by walking across on the ice; he found it to be 500 yards wide.

Clark went on a hunting party on December 14 and 15 when there was “much snow” and it was 52 degrees below freezing.  Buffalo continued to be seen on the 18th, but again the weather was too cold for hunting.  Thus during this period they appeared to have been visited by a large herd which remained in the vicinity of the camp for ten days, not having seen buffalo since the end of October.  They next reported buffalo on January 6th, when Clark was out hunting them with 16 men, killing a total of eight.

On January 14, Clark wrote that one of their hunters, who had been sent out for several days, returned to say that another member of the expedition, Whitehouse, was so badly frostbitten that he could not walk home.

In spite of the cold, Lewis reported on the same day that there was an eclipse of the moon which he observed with the small refracting telescope that was part of his sextant, having “no other glass to assist me in this observation.”  He was able to “define the edge of the moon’s image.”  He wrote that clouds interrupted his observations, which made the observation of the “commencement of total darkness” inaccurate.  “The last two observations the end of total darkness and the end of the eclipse, were more satisfactory,” he wrote.  These observations Lewis used to locate the longitude of their winter fort.  Thus he continued, in spite of the cold, to carefully map the expedition’s course across the continent, and to make quantitative measurements, in keeping with the scientific purpose of the expedition.

While we think of “man and nature” as a primitive experience – men pitting themselves against nature without the aid of civilization – in fact technologies played a key role in the success of the expedition, as Clark’s use of his sextant to observe the moon testifies.  Most important to the expedition along with the sextant were the compass, the gun, blacksmithing, knowledge of surveying, how to make wheels, wagons, ax handles and of course how to write.  At times, the blacksmith traded his skills for Mandan corn and repaired many objects.  The gun saved several of the men from grizzlies later in the trip, and hunting with guns provided the staple food, meat.

On the fourth of February, Lewis wrote that  “no buffalo have made their appearance in our neighborhood for some weeks” and their “stock of meat” was nearly exhausted.  Clark decided to take a group of men and go down river to hunt.  They pulled their baggage on small wooden sleighs, and also brought three pack horses to carry any meat they acquired.

Clark returned on the night of the 12th.  He and his men had walked 30 miles on the ice and through the woodlands.  In some places the snow was up to their knees.  On their first day, the fourth, they found nothing to hunt and had nothing to eat.  On the second, Clark broke through the ice and his feet and legs were wet.  On that day they killed a deer and two buffalo, but the buffalo were in too poor condition to eat.   They saw buffalo on February 8th but found them again too lean to be worth taking.  On the trip they killed elk and deer, which provided their meat until they were able to hunt again.  They had killed a total of 40 deer, 3 buffalo, and 16 elk.  They saw no more buffalo that winter.

Today we often romanticize about nature.  Most of us see nature on television, in the comfort of central heating and air conditioning.  Or we go to the ski slopes or snow-mobiling with the best of modern gear.  It is cold, but relatively few of us test ourselves against winter as did Lewis and Clark and their men, arriving at a place strange to them, maintaining good terms with the Mandans, building shelter for the winter, and finding food.  In the spring, they would move forward into an area completely unknown to the map-makers who came to St. Louis.  It is well to remember the difficult winter Lewis and Clark spent with the Mandans when we romanticize about nature and believe that what we may conserve will always be benign for us to visit.  It is just as likely to be like Clark’s hunting trip, with falls through the ice, buffalo too lean to eat, and the constant danger of frostbite.

Chapter 29 – Passage of Discovery: An Ecologist’s Guide to the Missouri River of Lewis and Clark

by Daniel B. Botkin, originally published by Perigee Books, a division of Penguin/Putnam, 1999.

This book, originally published as “Passage of Discovery, is an ecologist’s guide to the first half of the Lewis and Clark trail, their travels up the Missouri River from St. Louis to Three Forks, MT.  I have decided to share this book with the readers of my website, and I am going to present the entire book here, one chapter at a time, with a new chapter appearing each week.  There are more than 40 chapters.  If you follow along and read all of them, you will learn about the entire Missouri River as seen by Lewis and Clark at the beginning of the 19th century, and as I visited it during the 1990s to see what they had seen, and to learn how the countryside had changed.  Comparing what Lewis and Clark saw with what we see today is one of the best insights we can get of how nature and environment in American has changed since European settlement.   I hope you enjoy it and find it rewarding.

- Daniel B. Botkin

All of the chapters published thus far can be found in the Passage of Discovery category. Please note that they are listed in reverse order of date posted.

More books by Daniel Botkin are available for purchase from the Center For the Study Of the Environment bookstore.

29 The Confluence of the Niobrara and Missouri Rivers: Lewis and Clark Begin to See the Animals of the West

For directions to this area, refer to the entry for Niobrara State Park.

On September 4, 1804,  Clark recorded the expedition’s first encounter with mule deer and pronghorn, providing the first written scientific of the mule deer, whom they so named, and the name stuck.  Clark referred to “Several wild goats on the Clift & Deer with black tales.”  Later, on September 17, 1804, when the expedition neared the location of modern Chamberlain, South Dakota, Clark wrote a longer description of mule deer when one of the men, Colter, shot one.  Clark observed that it was “a Curious kind of Deer, A Darker grey than Common the hair longer & finer, the ears verry large & long a Small resepitical under its eye its tail round and white to near the end which is black & like a Cow” but “in every other respect like a Deer, except it runs like a goat” and later that it “jumps like a goat or Sheep” and it was “large.”

The expedition was near the 100th Longitudinal meridian, entering the short-grass prairie and the landscape and wildlife that we identify today as the American West – cowboy and Indian country of open plains and big skies.  They began to encounter a wealth of new species.

On that day also one of the hunters brought in “a Small wolf with a large bushey tail,” probably the expedition’s first encounter with a coyote. It was another of their contributions to biological science.  A few days later they would find prairie dogs and provide not only their first written description, but the first live specimen to be sent back and reach Virginia.   On September 16, 1804, they saw and shot a black-billed magpie, about which Lewis wrote a detailed description, noting that “the wings have nineteen feathers, of which the ten first have the longer side of their plumage white in the middle of the feather” and the “upper side of the wing, as well as the short side of the plumage” was “a dark blackis or bluish green sonetimes presenting as light orange yellow or bluish tin as it happens to be presented to different exposures of ligt.”  He wrote that “it is a most beatifull bird” with the outer wings changing in color with different light to be an orange green and then a reddish indigo blue.  He was observing one of the many kinds of birds whose plumage color is the result of the way light is refracted from the feathers rather than from an actual dye.

The mule deer is the characteristic deer of the western plains and Rocky Mountains, living in confer forests, desert shrublands, and prairies.  At the time of Lewis and Clark the mule deer occurred west from the Dakotas to the Pacific coast.  Along the coast, they were found from Baja California to British Columbia.  In the prairie, they ranged from the south edge of Alaska through Canada south into central Texas and interior Mexico.  Mule deer fees primarily on herbaceous plants including grasses, but also browse on shrubs and trees. The whitetail deer, the characteristic deer of the eastern United States, is more of a forest animal, primarily feeding on leaves and twigs of shrubs and trees as well as acorns.    At the time of the Lewis and Clark expedition, the whitetail had a larger range, and was found in Lewis and Clark’s home state of Virginia as well as the entire eastern seaboard.  It was absent at that time only from the Rocky Mountains and California.  Both deer remain abundant.

The pronghorn antelope is native only to North America.  It has been here for about 50 million years, since the Eocene.  Pronghorn feed on grasses and forbs during the growing season and eat shrubs in the fall and winter.  Some experts estimated that at the time of the Lewis and Clark expedition pronghorn may have been almost as abundant as buffalo, perhaps numbering 30 or 40 million.  But soon after the Lewis and Clark expedition, pronghorn became a major item in the diet of pioneers, and was also sold commercially.  A creature of the prairie, the pronghorn lost its habitat to the plow and cattle.  By the beginning of the twentieth century there were only about 10,000 pronghorn remaining.

Concern about the decline of this species occurred rather early in the history of conservation in America.  In the early twentieth century, states began to pass laws protecting the pronghorn and outlawing hunting.  Yearly censuses of the herds began, as well as collection of information about diseases and predation.  In the 1920s the first extensive census was made over the entire range, and there appeared to be about 30,000 pronghorn.  Today, these animals number over a million, with the greatest numbers in Montana, Wyoming and North Dakota.   They remain relatively rare in South Dakota — under 10,000.  Pronghorn have increased in abundance for the past 85 years and more than doubled between the late 70s and late 80s.  With care and restoration of prairie habitat, the outlook for the pronghorn remain good, it is possible to see pronghorn along Interstate 90 east and west of Gillette, Wyoming, but most likely you will still have to seek wildlife refuges and prairie preserves to see these animals.

Chapter 28 – Passage of Discovery: An Ecologist’s Guide to the Missouri River of Lewis and Clark

by Daniel B. Botkin, originally published by Perigee Books, a division of Penguin/Putnam, 1999.

This book, originally published as “Passage of Discovery, is an ecologist’s guide to the first half of the Lewis and Clark trail, their travels up the Missouri River from St. Louis to Three Forks, MT.  I have decided to share this book with the readers of my website, and I am going to present the entire book here, one chapter at a time, with a new chapter appearing each week.  There are more than 40 chapters.  If you follow along and read all of them, you will learn about the entire Missouri River as seen by Lewis and Clark at the beginning of the 19th century, and as I visited it during the 1990s to see what they had seen, and to learn how the countryside had changed.  Comparing what Lewis and Clark saw with what we see today is one of the best insights we can get of how nature and environment in American has changed since European settlement.   I hope you enjoy it and find it rewarding.

- Daniel B. Botkin

All of the chapters published thus far can be found in the Passage of Discovery category. Please note that they are listed in reverse order of date posted.

More books by Daniel Botkin are available for purchase from the Center For the Study Of the Environment bookstore.

28. The Niobrara River Meets the Missouri: Cedars Persist on the Bright Bluffs

From Yankton, South Dakota take Route 81 south to Route 12, turn right (west) and continue through the town of Niobrara.  The road follows a bluff uphill and a short way beyond the town, on the slope, is the entrance to Niobrara State Park on the right.  To canoe on the Niobrara River, continue on Route 12 to Valentine, Nebraska, more than 120 miles to the west.  There are several outfitters in Valentine.

On August 25, 1998, a new bridge over the Missouri opened for traffic.  It is located about 3 miles east of Niobrara and will eventually connect Nebraska Route 14 to South Dakota Route 37.  The bridge ends in South Dakota at Running Water, about 10 miles west of Springfield, South Dakota.

On September 4, 1804, Lewis and Clark were traveling up the Missouri River where it flows generally west to east, upstream about 30 miles from today’s town of Yankton, South Dakota, when they reached the mouth of the Niobrara River.  That river flows  generally from southwest by west, Clark wrote, forming an acute angle with the Missouri River and leaving a peninsula between the two.  Clark observed that “Qui courrse,” referring to the river by its French name, “Comes roleing its Sands” and was “Throwing out Sands like the Platt (only Corser) forming bars in its mouth.”  As was his practice, he measured the river and found it “152 yards wide at the mouth & 4 feet Deep.” Traveling up the Niobrara three miles to where there had been a Ponca Indian village, he found that  “The river widens above its mouth and is devided by Sand and Island, the Current verry rapid.”   The river was colored light, “like that of the Plat.” Along the Niobrara, “on the upper Side” Clark saw “a butifull Plain riseing gradially from the river.” Wildlife was abundant.

The next day, On September 5, 1804, the expedition headed upstream on the Missouri River and Clark wrote that they “passed a large Island of about 3 miles long in the Middle” of the river opposite of which was Ponca Creek.

Today the lower Niobrara River is part of the Wild and Scenic River System and famous among boaters as one of the top ten canoeing rivers in the United States.  I had wanted to see this river for a long time, partly because the Niobrara has not been channelized or otherwise altered, except for a small dam near Valentine, Nebraska.   Although much smaller than the Missouri, it retains the characteristics of a prairie river as Clark described it, flowing rapidly, carrying a heavy sediment load, and divided by sandbars.  I had also wanted to see the Niobrara because it is the river of one of my favorite  books which I had read several times since highschool, Old Jules, by the great Nebraska writer, Marie Sandoz.  She portrayed a prairie country that was open, lonely, but with a certain special appeal of the Niobrara River.  Also recommended is her work, “Lovesong To The Plains”.  We arrived at the mouth of the Niobrara on a beautiful spring afternoon, full of anticipation, but still greatly surprised by the beauty of the landscape and of the two rivers, the Niobrara and the Missouri, at their confluence.

We stayed at Niobrara State Park in a cabin on a bluff overlooking the confluence and the surrounding rolling countryside.  It was the most beautiful place that we stayed on the Missouri River downstream of Montana.  Late that afternoon we went out on the river in a Zodiac powered by an outboard motor with Rick Plooster, Assistant Park Superintendent, a trip available to park visitors during the summer.  Here the Missouri River is upstream from Gavin’s Point Dam and downstream from the other five major Missouri River dams.  The river flow is controlled, but otherwise the Missouri has the aspect of the unchannelized river as Lewis and Clark described it.

The Missouri widens upstream from the mouth of the Niobrara into a beautiful stretch of water with extensive sandbars on the northern, South Dakota, side and with beautiful bluffs on the southern, Nebraska, side.  We passed a large island just as Clark had mentioned, and saw that it was  large enough to have several vacation homes on it and to be well wooded.  Along the island’s shore was a layer of silty and sandy sediment among which large cottonwoods grew, perhaps 60 feet high.  We stopped to look at a beaver lodge above the water level.   Rick said that the island was used frequently in the summer by deer who browse on its trees.

We moved away from the island.  Scaup and mergansers paddled and flew.  An immature eagle soared above us.  We saw that the land on the southern, Nebraska shore was a series of bluffs and valleys, each bluff like an arch and each valley with seasonal or flowing small drainages.  The exposed rocks on the bluffs were yellow chalk, brightening in the late afternoon sunlight.  On some bluffs, below the chalk a shale-like rock was wasting away like roof shingles decaying on an old ranch house.   Hundreds of swallow nests clung to the under ledges on the bluffs.  Red cedars covered the summits of the bluffs, bur oaks grew on the mid-slopes and grasses in the valleys.  In the angling sunlight, the blue sky, dark green cedars and yellow sandstones reflected beautifully from the river.  Beyond the river the land had the look of dry country and of the West.  Rick said he thought this was a hidden jewel of a park and we agreed.

Since cedars come into prairie when fire is suppressed, and since frequent fires keep the cedars out and promote grasses, I thought that the dense stands of cedars on the summits must be the result of fire suppression since settlement and farming of this land.   The pattern was well-known, and we had seen it at Loess Hills Recreation Area in Iowa: Where fire has been suppressed and water is abundant, cedars grow and shade out the prairie grasses.  But cedars are also relatively short-lived trees, few reaching 100 years.  I guessed that the dense cedars on the bluffs must be an indication that the wildfire suppression began within the last 100 years.

In the evening, we walked through the park.  We saw deer and turkeys in the twilight and heard the turkeys call, joined by the haunting fluting of whippoorwills.  After the sun went down, I decided to check the journals of the Lewis and Clark expedition once again.  On September 4, 1804, Clark wrote that he saw “a large ganuge of turkeys,” much as we had seen and heard them that evening.  But I was surprised to read that upstream a little way from the mouth of the Niobrara, Clark “walked on the top of the hill forming a Cliff Covd with red Ceeder.”  And here the expedition stopped to make a new mast of cedar.  If the red cedar were there almost two hundred years ago just as they were on our visit, then it is unlikely that there has been a change in fire frequency.  I had been too quick to attribute causes to human interventions.  Perhaps the wildfire frequency was lower here than elsewhere because the two rivers came together at an acute angle, somewhat isolating the land between them from fires.  Also, fires were less likely to reach the tops of the bluffs, so the cedars might have been protected that way.  But some wildfires had to reach the cedars.  Otherwise the cedars would begin to reach their maximum age and die back, and we would have seen many dead cedars and logs, and perhaps other trees like the oaks would have been coming in among the cedars.

Once again, I found that there was much about the natural history of the American West that I could learn from the combination of reading these journals and reading the landscape.  The journals were more than the interesting history of an adventure.  They provided an accurate account of the landscape and its plants and animals almost two hundred years ago, a description difficult to obtain elsewhere because few made such careful notes as Lewis and Clark.  Even today, in our age of information, it is rare to find careful journals about the natural history of a region.

The next day we drove to Valentine, Nebraska, rented a canoe, and paddled down the Niobrara for about 12 miles.  A stiff wind blew and the water was cold in early spring.  It was before the main canoeing season and we saw no other people on the river, famous for its wall-to-wall canoeists in the summer.

In the fast moving current, we passed sandbars and wetlands as the river took us through a deep valley beside rising bluffs.  Once again we were surprised by the beauty of this landscape, a place we hoped one day to return; a place with the look and feel of the countryside seen by Lewis and Clark and from which we had learned a little more, with the help of Clark’s journal, about the natural history of the western landscape.

Chapter 27 – Passage of Discovery: An Ecologist’s Guide to the Missouri River of Lewis and Clark

by Daniel B. Botkin, originally published by Perigee Books, a division of Penguin/Putnam, 1999.

This book, originally published as “Passage of Discovery, is an ecologist’s guide to the first half of the Lewis and Clark trail, their travels up the Missouri River from St. Louis to Three Forks, MT.  I have decided to share this book with the readers of my website, and I am going to present the entire book here, one chapter at a time, with a new chapter appearing each week.  There are more than 40 chapters.  If you follow along and read all of them, you will learn about the entire Missouri River as seen by Lewis and Clark at the beginning of the 19th century, and as I visited it during the 1990s to see what they had seen, and to learn how the countryside had changed.  Comparing what Lewis and Clark saw with what we see today is one of the best insights we can get of how nature and environment in American has changed since European settlement.   I hope you enjoy it and find it rewarding.

- Daniel B. Botkin

All of the chapters published thus far can be found in the Passage of Discovery category. Please note that they are listed in reverse order of date posted.

More books by Daniel Botkin are available for purchase from the Center For the Study Of the Environment bookstore.

27. Vermillion: On the Wild and Scenic Missouri

In Sioux City, Iowa, Ponca, Nebraska, Vermillion and Yankton, South Dakota, seek local river guides.  There is no formal organization of these guides; check with bait shops, etc.

On August 26, 1804, Clark wrote that  “The river verry full of Sand bars,” as the expedition passed near the location of modern Vermillion, South Dakota, and moved upstream.  They saw “a Island & large Sand bars on both sides” where the river was wide and the expedition passed white cliffs and elsewhere others of blue or Dark earth of 2 mile in extent” — cliffs of white chalk estimated now to be late Cretaceous, therefore more than 60 million years old.  Two days later they found several sand bars on the river and Clark reported that “the river here is wide & Shallow full of Sand bars.”  One of the pirogues struck a snag which cut through it “and like to have sunk” Clark continued.  It was a difficult river, soon to be notorious for its ability to sink boats.   These qualities of the river would become all too familiar to steamboat pilots and their passengers.

Steamboats first ran on the Missouri on May 18, 1819, almost fifteen years to the day after Lewis and Clark started their trip.  Steamboating as a dominate form of transportation lasted only four decades, ending before the Civil War, replaced by railroads.  Yet so treacherous was the Missouri that more than 450 steamboats were lost on the river during that time – a rate of about 11 wrecks a year.  Some say that the average lifetime of a steamboat was four trips.

Most of that treacherous, wild Missouri exists no longer, replaced by the Army Corps of Engineers’ channelization of the river below Ponca State Park, Mile 753.  Although a hazard to navigation, this original river has a quality of the wild that is little known and little appreciated, except by a few who live along the only downstream reach of the Missouri that has not been channelized.  This is the lower wild and scenic portion of the Missouri; it extends 59 miles from near Gavins Point Dam to Ponca State Park.  It was here that we were fortunate to go out in a small boat with someone who had lived his life on this part of the river.

I”m just an old river rat,” Jim Peterson said, “I was born in Ponca, Nebraska, and my father took me on the river when I was a small boy.  Been boating on the river ever since.  Don’t fish.  People ask me what I do on the river.  I tell them I just like being on the river.”  It was a beautiful cloudless spring day when we pushed Jim’s outboard boat off of the silty bank, a bank that gave way under our feet if we stepped where it was wet – just a little warning by the river about the material that it used to make up its sandbars.

Soon we were out in the middle of the Missouri, passing a large sandbar of the type Clark observed almost two centuries before.  After busy days of travel by car and traveling here and there on the channelized Missouri, we felt a wonderful sense of peacefulness in the center of the river.  We passed lines of cottonwoods just opening their leaves on the large sandbar/island.  An occasional waterbird flew before us.  There was no one else on the river.  This was the most serene and beautiful of all of our experiences on the lower Missouri — the Missouri below the most downstream of the big dams.  Jim slowed the boat to see if we could get up a small tributary.  The silty sediment of the river scratched against the aluminum bottom of the boat. But for Jim’s experience and skill, we might have run aground.  Jim backed the boat off.  It may sound strange to say that a motorboat ride was serene and gave a sense of wildness, but on this big river, this is exactly what we felt.

“If anybody tells you he never ran aground on this part of the Missouri,” Jim said, “he’s a liar.  I run aground from time to time.”  Jim was much more than a river rat.  He had recently retired as a faculty member at the University of South Dakota and was President of the Lewis and Clark Trail Heritage Foundation.  He was a devotee of the Lewis and Clark expedition; his pickup license plate was “LCTHF.”  Jim knew the river so well that he had navigated the paddle-wheel steamboat, the Far West, from Yankton, South Dakota to Ponca — through this untamed portion of the river — when that boat was being moved to Florida, having failed to attract enough customers to maintain a tourist business from Yankton.

We talked about why there was so little tourist business of taking people on the river.  He said the season was short — June, July and August, and the liability insurance rates extremely high for motor boats, and that a federal motor boat licence was required.  “As soon as Labor Day is past, children are in school and the business dries up,” he said.  But he also observed that the number of foreign visitors was increasing, and I suggested that this kind of business might begin to attract a different, wider audience as the Lewis and Clark journey became more popular.  Jim spoke of the difficulties of navigating the sandbars and snags on the river.  That is another reason this is a difficult tourist business.  The very qualities that made the Missouri a beautiful and peaceful place to be on that spring day are the ones that make it difficult to be there.

And so it is difficult today to find a way to travel on this wild and scenic reach of the Missouri River.  We asked Jim what someone could do, because there is no professional organization of river guides here.  “Go into a local bait shop, boat dealer or bar,” he said, “Ask around.  Usually you can find a river rat like me who will be happy to take you on the river.”  At least until the river becomes so popular that the boatmen form that professional organization.  As the boat eased back against the silty shore, we decided that, if your intention was to experience the sense of the river as it used to be, and to seek a place of beauty on the Missouri, you would come here.