• Home
  • About Dan
  • Books by Daniel Botkin
    • Signed Books
  • Reflections & Opinions
    • Renegade Naturalist Radio
  • Research
  • Dan Botkin’s Newsletter
    • Manage Your Account
  • Speaking & Consulting

Daniel B. Botkin

Solving environmental problems by understanding how nature works

  • People & Nature
  • Climate, Energy & Biodiversity
  • Myths, Folklore & Science

Is it People Versus Nature or People Within Nature?

January 4, 2014 By Daniel Botkin Leave a Comment

Among the many stories that have come out of the Australasian Antarctic Expedition that got stuck in the ice, is this quote: “It's fantastic—I love it when the ice wins and we don't," marine ecologist Tracy Rogers told the BBC journalist onboard, adding: "It reminds you that as humans, we don't control everything and that the natural world—it's the winner here." It’s an interesting twist back to some very old ideas.

In the Anglo-Saxon epic, Beowulf, the impression one gets is of people primarily huddled around a fire, protecting themselves against (the emphasis is on against) nature.  Beowulf becomes a hero by going out from that protected patch to kill Grendel and his mother, the monsters of deep waters who represent all that is evil about nature.  It is definitely nature against people, nature mostly winning.  In the even more ancient Epic of Gilgamesh, a poem from Mesopotamia said to be one of the oldest written literature still in existence, the central character becomes a hero by going into the (evil) forest and being brave enough to cut down trees and let in sunlight, conquering nature.

Charlie Beveridge Mt. Katahdin 200dpi adj
A view from partway up Mt. Katahdin, Maine's tallest mountain, climbed in 1846 by Henry David Thoreau to test out what people within nature at its rawest was like.

As a student of nature and of writings and thinking about nature, it has seemed to me that one of the advances in modern thinking and feeling about people and nature was expressed by Henry David Thoreau.  As I write in  No Man's Garden: Thoreau and a New Vision for Civilization and Nature (2012, ebook,  New York, Croton River Publishers), Thoreau went to the Maine Woods mainly to test then current beliefs about people and nature and to test for himself how he felt about each and both together.

Famous for his quote, in wildness is the preservation of the world, Henry David Thoreau left his home in Concord, Massachusetts on August 31, 1846 and went to the woods of Maine to discover wilderness for himself, rather than take other people's word for what it was like and what it meant.  He climbed Mt. Katahdin, the tallest mountain in the state, to see what it was like to confront Nature at her wildest, in her own element, as he described it.  He didn’t like it.  He felt "more lone than you can imagine."  In the thinner air on the mountaintop "Vast, Titanic, inhuman nature" had him "at a disadvantage, caught him alone."  He felt that he had lost "some of his divine faculty" He continued “This was that Earth of which we have heard, made out of Chaos and Old Night.  Here was no man's garden, but an unhandseled globe.  It was not lawn, nor pasture, nor mead, nor woodland, nor lea, nor arable, nor waste land."

Later, back in Concord, he wrote “the wilderness is simple, almost to barrenness."  What he really liked was a combination of civilized — settled — countryside, with some access to wilderness.   "The partially cultivated country it is which chiefly has inspired, and will continue to inspire, the strains of poets, such as compose the mass of any literature.  Our woods are sylvan, and their inhabitants woodsmen and rustics," he wrote,   "Perhaps our own woods and fields . . . are the perfection of parks and groves, gardens, arbors, paths, vistas, and landscapes."    He liked a swamp on the edge of town, the richest of organic ecosystems together with the richness of civilization.

One comes away from reading Thoreau that it was people and nature, people together with nature, each enhancing the other, that was his preference.  He was careful to distinguish between “wildness,” which was for him a positive state of mind, with physical “wilderness,” which is found mostly barren and a place where, he wrote with his affection for bad puns, “a poet would pine.” It wasn’t people against nature or nature against us. To me, this was a major statement of an advancement in our relationship with nature. We were seen as part of nature, within nature.  It is my conviction that if we are going to solve our major environmental problems, we have to join Thoreau in this perception.  Perhaps this is the main message I took away from the ice-stuck voyage of the Russian ship  Akademik Shokalskiy.  Why didn’t all of its modern technological age prevent this from happening?  In my mind, Thoreau would remind us that we need to think within nature, not against it, and that technologies ---- which he was also immersed in as inventor and user — was not by itself the solution.

Share Button

Filed Under: People & Nature

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

From Daniel B. Botkin, Ph.D

Daniel Botkin
I believe we are mostly on the wrong track in the way we try to deal with the environment. Everything I do, study, learn, and advise about the environment is different from the status quo. Throughout my career, I have tried to understand how nature works and use that understanding to figure out how we can solve our most pressing environmental problems.

My process over the past 45 years has been to look carefully at the facts, make simple calculations from them (sometimes simple computer models) and then tell people what I have learned. It’s surprising how rarely people bother to look at the facts. This has surprised me every time I’ve started a new ecology research project or work on an environmental issue.

In the course of my work and studies, I have learned many things and I want to tell you about them. That is the purpose of this website.

Follow @danielbotkin

Books by Dan Botkin

The Moon in the Nautilus Shell  Strange Encounters
Powering the Future  No Man's Garden
See all books by Dan Botkin

Jabowa III Forest Model


Jabowa Forest Model
Jabowa Forest Model for Windows 7.
This forest model, used around the world, was developed first in 1970 by Daniel B. Botkin, James F. Janak and James R. Wallis

JABOWA remains the most completely detailed and well validated forest growth model available, accounting for 95% or more of the variation in real forests where it has been tested.

The book Forest Dynamics: An Ecological Model (available as an eBook) provides a complete description of the model and the rationales behind its development.

Order Online

Sea Ice Study

The Bockstoce and Botkin Historical Sea Ice Data Study has a new home at the University of Alaska website. The data include more than 52,000 daily observations in an unbroken 65 year record from 1849 – 1914.

See related papers

Return to top of page

Copyright © 2006–2023 Daniel B. Botkin · Site by Webdancers · Log in